Is Kilimanjaro Harder Than Everest Base Camp

Kilimanjaro vs. Everest Basecamp: What makes it harder?

The terrain of the two famous peaks of Mount Kilimanjaro and Mount Everest Basecamp make them both challenging hikes. Prospective climbers desiring an extreme ascent may have to opt to try one or the other. So which one is more difficult?
The first factor to consider when it comes to climbing up either Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp is the altitude. Kilimanjaro stands tall at 19,341 feet, while Everest Basecamp is 13,779 feet above sea level. This makes Kilimanjaro a larger challenge when it comes to altitude adjustment and acclimatization. This can be both exhausting and dangerous, as the thin air and extreme elevation can lead to altitude sickness if climbers do not plan and acclimatize properly.
Additionally, the terrain of Kilimanjaro is much harsher and more varied than that of Everest Basecamp. Climbing Kilimanjaro can require scrambling over loose rocks, which can be incredibly challenging and dangerous. The trek also requires ascending steep inclines and traversing long stretches of dusty and uneven terrain. This type of terrain can be much more physically demanding than the mostly flat and smooth trails of Everest Basecamp.
Safety is also something to consider when evaluating which climb is easier or harder. The most successful attempts up Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp are accomplished by professional climbers with extensive experience and training. As a result, attempting either summit alone is highly discouraged. Climbing Kilimanjaro can require trekkers to be exposed to more intense weather, including storms and high winds, and the campsites are far more remote than those located on the Everest Basecamp hike.
Kilimanjaro also presents a unique set of logistical challenges. The mountain contains some of the most divergent vegetation zones in the world, ranging from tropical forest to alpine desert. This means trekkers on Kilimanjaro must be prepared to experience extreme changes in climate and temperature. In addition, water sources can be scarce and the number of people camping at the same time can create overcrowding and long lines.
In light of examining which of these two famous mountains is more challenging, the conclusion is highly subjective. It is important to note that Kilimanjaro is a much closer and easier summit to attempt than Everest Basecamp. Although Kilimanjaro has a higher elevation, it does not involve the use of professional-level climbing or mountaineering gear. Many climbers opt for Kilimanjaro first for the easier beginner-level experience before attempting a trek to Everest Basecamp.

Climber Preparation

Despite which peak is chosen, whether it is Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp, proper preparation is key. Trekkers should plan ahead and have adequate physical and mental training along with all necessary gear and supplies. Professional guides and equipment are essential as there is no room for negligence on such a challenge. For Kilimanjaro, it is also wise to bring an ample supply of warm clothing and plenty of electrolyte drinks to stay hydrated and healthy.
For Everest Basecamp, trekkers need to be prepared for the high altitudes and extreme temperatures. In addition, Everest Basecamp is a much longer trek than Kilimanjaro and includes various features such as glaciers and steep terrain that require more technical and experienced climbers. It is more physically demanding and more dangerous than Kilimanjaro, but those who are successful in completing the summit certainly reap the rewards of the effort.

Expert Perspectives

For insight on which mountain is more challenging, it is important to examine the thoughts of experienced climbers. While Kilimanjaro has a higher elevation than Everest Basecamp and includes various difficult terrain features, many experienced mountaineers regard Everest Basecamp as significantly more challenging. This is because the longer duration and more intense technical elements required for an ascent to the Basecamp requires extensive experience and robust physical condition.
One professional climber, Michael Kennedy, describes the two climbs like this, “Kilimanjaro is an easier climb than Everest Basecamp because although Kilimanjaro has a higher elevation, the duration and technical elements of the ascent are easier than that of Everest Basecamp.” These technical elements include ice climbing and the use of professional equipment such as carabiners and climbing ropes, which can be intimidating and dangerous for a novice or beginner climber.
There are some opinions that state Everest Basecamp can be more difficult than the summit of the whole mountain. This is relatively true due to the technical and logistical requirements, but it is also due to the significant number of other people attempting the summit all at once. This can lead to overcrowding and extended wait times, making the summit even more difficult.

Risk and Reward

It is important to weigh the risks and rewards when considering which mountain is more difficult. Mount Kilimanjaro and Mount Everest Basecamp are both incredible feats, and both present extreme challenges. That being said, climbers should always be aware of the risks associated with attempting these peaks and the potential for serious consequences.
Kilimanjaro and Everest Basecamp are not for the faint of heart. Although Kilimanjaro may appear easier than Everest Basecamp, it requires a level of physical and mental fortitude that many climbers find difficult to attain. As such, it is important to be honest with oneself about physical and mental limitations deemed necessary for the ascent.
That being said, achieving the summit of either of these two famous peaks is a tremendous accomplishment. The reward of reaching the summit on either Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp is unmatched, and most climbers feel an immense sense of pride and celebration when the goal is achieved.

Environmental Effects

It is also worth noting that both Kilimanjaro and Everest Basecamp have suffered tremendously from the effects of climate change. Glaciers are shrinking, weather patterns are deteriorating, and ecosystems are suffering due to a lack of water and resources. It is essential to be conscious of the environment while attempting either climb, as climbers are contributing to the destruction of the environment.
Additionally, it is essential to be aware of the local cultures and customs when embarking on either of these climbs. Trekkers must be respectful of the local people and their traditions, and maintain the highest levels of conservation when it comes to protecting the environment.
Even with ever-present environmental threats, Kilimanjaro and Everest Basecamp will continue to be thrilling adventures with life-changing rewards. Ultimately, climbers must determine which peak fits their individual needs in order to enjoy a safe and successful journey.


When opting for either Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp, sustainability must be taken into account. It is important for trekkers to be mindful of the environmental impact of their journey, as it can lead to both positive and negative consequences.
For example, some initiatives have been implemented to reduce the environmental impact of the trek, such as reducing the amount of single-use plastic used on the journey. Non-biodegradable materials such as energy bars and packaged foods can be avoided and replaced by eco-friendly alternatives. Additionally, trekkers should bring reusable water containers and be conscious of the waste they generate while trekking.
It is also important to be conscious of the energy required to fuel the equipment and carriages used to get to the summit. To minimize energy consumption, campers should try to use renewable energy sources, such as solar panels, rather than non-renewable ones.
Finally, climbers can use their journey to support local communities and their work around the mountain. This may include supporting projects that promote the conservation of the environment and wildlife, as well as communities’ needs for medical care and education.

Altitude Sickness

The single most dangerous aspect of attempting a summit to Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp is the possibility of experiencing altitude sickness. Altitude sickness is an element that can quickly take a trekker’s life, if not properly treated and monitored.
Altitude sickness typically occurs when individuals rise up to altitudes of 8,000 feet or higher, however the risk of experiencing it is much higher when attempting a peak like Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp. This is because the altitude is significantly higher than 8,000 feet.
Altitude sickness can present itself in various forms, such as headaches, dizziness, shortness of breath, and nausea. It is important for climbers to be aware of the potential symptoms and take proper steps to avoid it. This may include acclimating to the altitude, rest, and the use of oxygen.
Despite the dangers and risks of altitude sickness, it is important to remember that with proper preparation both Kilimanjaro and Everest Basecamp are doable and rewarding. The experiences that come with achieving each summit are experiences of a lifetime and worth every effort.

Guide Preparation

When considering which peak to attempt, it is important to ensure the trekking guides are experienced and have adequate knowledge of the terrain. For Kilimanjaro, it is essential to get one certified by the Kilimanjaro National Park Authority. For Everest Basecamp, the guides should be experienced mountaineers who can help trekkers with navigating difficult terrain and areas with high elevation.
It is also important for climbers and trekkers to check the gear provided by their guides. This means being sure that the gear is in good condition, and that any safety harnesses and navigation tools are in proper working order and fit properly.
Finally, it is important for the trekkers to be aware of safety protocols, especially those related to altitude sickness. Responsible guides should be able to inform their teams of the signs and symptoms of altitude sickness, as well help them ascend the peak at a safe and sustainable pace.

Social Responsibility

Finally, it is essential to consider the social implications when attempting either Kilimanjaro or Everest Basecamp. These peaks have become increasingly popular in recent years, and they have in turn become overcrowded. It is important to be cognizant of the impact this can have on the environment, local cultures, and the wildlife.
Trekkers can do their part by being conscious of their actions and ensuring that their impact is minimal. This may include avoiding littering and unnecessary noise, as well as respecting the local cultures and customs. Trekkers who opt for either of these two peaks should also adhere to local regulations that promote the conservation of the environment.
In addition, supporting local initiatives that empower local communities is an effective way to ensure that the trekkers’ experience is positive and all of the necessary resources are managed appropriately. This can include supporting local businesses, such as tour operators, caterers, and small-scale farms and businesses.
In conclusion, both Kilimanjaro and Everest Basecamp are excellent choices for those looking for an extreme summit experience. Each presents a unique set of challenges, risks, and rewards, and while Kilimanjaro may appear to be the easier of the two, the experience is no less fulfilling. Ultimately, the choice of peak should depend on personal preferences, physical ability, and experience.

Herman Shaw is a passionate traveler and avid photographer who has seen many of the world's most awe-inspiring monuments. He has developed expertise in various aspects of world architecture and culture which he enjoys sharing with his readers. With deep historical knowledge and insight, Herman's writing brings life to these remarkable artifacts and highlights their importance in the grand scheme of human history.

Leave a Comment